The Java backlash has been building up steam, and we’re starting to see some fundamental shifts because of it.
Continue reading it here.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
The Java backlash has been building up steam, and we’re starting to see some fundamental shifts because of it.
Continue reading it here.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
Venho informar que a Telefonica não tem o mínimo de respeito pelo consumidor. Ocorre que no plano de conta de telefone residencial (em meu nome) tem um contrato de serviço “FALE À VONTADE” em que pago uma taxa e falo dentro do estado de São Paulo, com qualquer numero que varia do DDD 11 até o DDD 19. Hoje recebi uma carta informando que o “BENEFICIO PROMOCIONAL – FALE À VONTADE” (como esta empresa chama o serviço que eu pago) está LIMITANDO o uso a partir do dia 20/04/2009 para ligações de fixo para fixo somente dentro da rede Telefonica, e que caso seja usado em ligações para outra operadora implicará em ” COBRANÇA A TITULO DE MINUTOS EXCENTES”.
No contato que eu realizei com esta empresa, foi informada que devido a demanda da portabilidade para troca de operadoras, a Telefonica irá cobrar as ligações fora da sua rede. Não foi o serviço que eu contratei inicialmente, e agora simplesmente eles mudam o contexto, e como sempre, que sai prejudicado somos nós. ME SINTO lesado POR ESTA pela Telefonica. Eu adquiri um serviço onde eles afirmavam que eu poderia ligar para qualquer DDD 11 até o 19, agora eles simplesmente mudaram a regra dizendo que eu só posso ligar para qualquer DDD dentro da rede da telefônica. Onde já se viu esse absurdo.
Que mundo é esse ?
Como a agência reguladora permite isso ?
No Reclame Aqui encontrei outras pessoas com o mesmo problema:
Telefonica muda o contexto do contrato do “Fale a Vontade” – reclamação 1
Telefonica muda o contexto do contrato do “Fale a Vontade” – reclamação 2
Existe alguma maneira de eu processar a Telefonica ? Alguém já fez isso ?
Porque se continuar assim, mudando as regras estabelecidas no contrato, realmente não sei onde iremos parar.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
The Java Community Process doesn’t exist. At least not in the way you probably think it does. This surprised even me (although it shouldn’t have), and I’ll explain here just exactly what I mean. Continue reading it here.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
I woke up this morning to the news of Oracle’s agreement to buy Sun and I naturally have to wonder about what this means for Java and Java 7. Oracle has been focused on Java as the common language for enterprise software for a long time so I think this makes great strategic sense for Oracle. It raises lots of questions though. Continue reading it here.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
Last year, Oracle acquired BEA Systems, the hottest company in enterprise Java…until around 2001. Today, they announced the acquisition of Sun Microsystems, the architects of the infrastructure of the dot com era. Remember the “dot in dot com”?
Both companies represent the history of enterprise Java, and are far less important to the future. Continue reading it here.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
Larry Ellison has always wanted to be the Steve Jobs of the enterprise. With this morning’s announcement that Oracle will buy Sun Microsystems for $7.4 billion, he took a big step towards making Oracle more of a soup-to-nuts provider of enterprise technology. With Sun, he will now be able to build and package together everything from chips and servers to operating systems, Java middleware, databases, and enterprise applications. Continue reading it here.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
Boy, it sure was polite of Sun and Oracle to wait until the day I got back from my vacation to announce their merger, wasn’t it? I fulminated gloomily about this possibility before I left, but now that I’ve spent a day absorbing the news, I’m … slightly less gloomy. Continue reading it here.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
A community weighs the pros and cons of Oracle’s new claim on Java.
While Oracle and Sun Microsystems are hailing Oracle’s purchase of Sun as a big boost for Java, others are not so sure. Some with stake in the Java ecosystem are questioning what kind of control Oracle might try to exercise over the popular software development platform, which has driven enterprise applications since its debut in 1995. Observers also expect Oracle to make a go of trying to make more money off of Java than Sun ever could. Continue reading it here.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
Oracle CEO cites Java, Solaris as key components of acquisition.
Oracle may have decided to buy Sun Microsystems because it was worth far more to the database market leader than it was to IBM. It’s not a question of the price — at $7.4 billion, Oracle didn’t agree to pay much more than what IBM reportedly was considering. But Oracle may have more use for Sun’s technology than IBM ever did. Continue reading it here.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho
I found the JavaWorld’s Technology Insider Podcasts which is inside views on essential and emerging Java technologies from the developers shaping the future of the Java platform. I strongly recommend it.
Kleber Rodrigo de Carvalho